Hydrogen Peroxide Enhances Removal of NO^sub x^ From Flue Gases
NASA Tech Briefs, Jan 2005
Radicals from homogeneous decomposition of H^sub 2^O^sub 2^ react with unscrubbable NO to produce scrubbable gases.
John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida
Pilot scale experiments have demonstrated a method of reducing the amounts of oxides of nitrogen (NO^sub x^) emitted by industrial boilers and powerplant combustors that involves (1) injection of H^sub 2^O^sub 2^ into flue gases and (2) treatment of the flue gases by caustic wet scrubbing like that commonly used to remove SO^sub 2^ from combustion flue gases. Heretofore, the method most commonly used for removing NOx from flue gases has been selective catalytic reduction (SCR), in which the costs of both installation and operation are very high. After further development, the present method may prove to be an economically attractive alternative to SCR.
The primary constituent of NO^sub x^ is NO. Although the nitrogen acid gases HNO^sub 2^ and HNO^sub 3^ (and, to a lesser extent, NO^sub 2^) can be removed from flue gas by caustic scrubbing, NO is almost completely insoluble and thus not scrubbable. If, however, the NO in NO^sub x^ could be economically converted to HNOg and HNO^sub 3^, then scrubbing could be an effective means for removing NO^sub x^.
NO can be oxidized to HNO^sub 2^, HNO^sub 3^, and NO^sub 2^ at low to moderate flue-gas temperatures by use of hydroxyl radicals (OH). In the present method, the OH needed for oxidation of NO is generated by thermal decomposition of the H^sub 2^O^sub 2^ injected into the flue gas.
For efficiency, it is necessary to maximize the proportion of OH and HO^sub 2^ radicals, relative to other products of decomposition of H^sub 2^O^sub 2^. In particular, it is necessary to suppress a competing reaction in which H^sub 2^O^sub 2^ decomposes into water and oxygen. This competing reaction occurs readily at surfaces. In general, peroxides are preserved at acidic surfaces and are decomposed at basic ones. Experiments have shown that the incidence of the competing decomposition into H2O and O can be reduced by treating reactor surfaces with boric acid to render them acidic.
In one of several sets of experiments to demonstrate the feasibility of the method, the optimum temperature for conversion of NO to HNO^sub 2^, HNO^sub 3^, and NO^sub 2^ by use of injected H^sub 2^O^sub 2^ was found to be about 500 °C (see Figure 1).
A study performed under the guidelines of the EPA, EPRI comparing the economics of SCR and the experimental H^sub 2^O^sub 2^-injection/scrubbing method was conducted for a design base case and a variety of alternative cases. This study illustrated the tradeoff between capital and operating costs for the two methods. The single largest factor in determining the total cost of one method relative to the other method was found to be the H^sub 2^O^sub 2^:NO^sub x^ molar ratio. At the H^sub 2^O^sub 2^:NO^sub x^ molar ratio of 1.92, which was previously demonstrated in the laboratory, the H^sub 2^O^sub 2^-injection/scrubbing method was shown to be uneconomical. However, it was also concluded that the molar ratio in a full-size coal-fired power plant could belower than that found in the laboratory, and that on the basis of all the assumptions of the study, at an H^sub 2^O^sub 2^:NO^sub x^ molar ratio of 1.37, the H^sub 2^O^sub 2^-injection/scrubbing method could be an economically feasible alternative to SCR.
Pilot-scale tests run at Kennedy Space Center demonstrated the feasibility and competitiveness of this new technology. The H^sub 2^O^sub 2^ to NO molar ratio, at 500 °G shown to achieve a NO conversion efficiency of > 90 percent was 1:1, which is significantly lower than the required 1.37:1 (see Figure 2).
This work was done by Michelk M. Collins of Kennedy Space Center and C. David Cooper and Christian A. Clausen III of the University of Central Florida.
This invention is owned by NASA, and a patent application has been fikd. Inquiries concerning nonexclusive or exclusive license for its commercial development should be addressed to the Technology Commercialization Office, Kennedy Space Center, (321) 867-1463. Refer to KSC-12056.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Reference Articles
- A Maryland state trooper gave Erik Bonstrom an $80 ticket for driving too slowly
- In California, postal worker Dean Hudson has been found guilty
- Alec Loorz, the 15-year-old founder of Kids vs. Global Warming and recent Brower Youth Award recipient, went to Congress in November for a press conference with Senators Barbara Boxer and John Kerry, who are championing legislation to stabilize US greenho
- Foreign exchange
- The buzz on bees
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- Credit card debt on college campuses: causes, consequences, and solutions
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- Rejoice anyway - Zephaniah 3:14-20, Philippians 4:4-7 - Living by the Word - Column
- Living by the word



