On CBS.com: Free videos, free entertainment
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
ProQuest

Teachers' Perspectives on Principal Mistreatment

Teacher Education Quarterly,  Fall 2006  by Blase, Joseph,  Blase, Jo

<< Page 1  Continued from page 15.  Previous | Next

Schools run on loveóof the kids, the subject, the work, the hope, the possibilities, the smiles of satisfaction, the looks of appreciation, the little things that keep teachers and students and leaders going. The principal whose interactions with staff undermine this all-important source of energy by creating dissociation between teachersí selfconfidence and their professional self-image is like the captain drilling a hole in her/ his own ship. No matter how hard you bail, itís always sinking. Leaders who cause teachers emotional damage would be wise to reconsider the cost effectiveness, if nothing else, of disintegrating a teacherís self, a precariously balanced entity that is already overtaxed. Leaders who are sensitive to teachersí needs for congruity and emotional understanding in their professional relationships with their leaders can provide invaluable support and catalyze creativity which can benefit exponentially, the whole school community. (Beatty, 2001, p. 36)

References

Andersson, L.M., & Pearson, C.M. (1999)/ Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workforce. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452-471.

Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755-778.

Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 161-173.

Bassman, E. S. (1992). Abuse in the workplace: Management remedies and bottom line impact. New York: Quorum.

Beatty, B.R. (April, 2001). Emotion matters in educational leadership: An analysis of teacherrecalled interactions with administrators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.

Bj rkvist, K., ÷sterman, K., & Hjelt-B[per thousand]ck, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 173-184.

Blase, J., & Blase , J. (2003). Breaking the silence: Overcoming the problem of principal mistreatment of teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Caldwell, B.J. (2000). Reinventing school leadership for lasting reform in the third millennium. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T.E. Hauge, & J. Mller (Eds.), The life and work of teachers (pp. 256-270. London, UK: Falmer.

Caldwell, B.J., & Spinks, J.M. (1992). Leading the self-managing school. London, UK: Falmer Press.

CAWB (The Campaign Against Workplace Bullying). P.O. Box 1886, Benecia, CA 94510. 888-FIX-WORK; www.bullybusters.org

Davenport, N., Schwartz, R. D., & Elliott, G. P. (1999). Mobbing: Emotional abuse in the American workplace. Ames, IA: Civil Society Publishing.

Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996). Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 185-201.