JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Justice System Journal, 2005 by Douglas, James W
Where would a student interested in pursuing a career in judicial administration go to acquire appropriate organizational skills and managerial training? Where would a future scholar interested in studying the courts go to gain a basic understanding of how the judicial branch administers its operations? On the surface these questions appear to have easy answers. Are there not masters of public administration (MPA) programs throughout the country that provide future public servants with the tools and skills necessary to administer public programs and organizations? Don't doctoral programs in political science allow students to specialize in the study of public law? One would imagine programs such as these would include components examining the uniqueness of judicial administration. Unfortunately, this would be an incorrect assumption.
An examination of the MPA programs accredited by the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA) or of the curriculums of doctoral programs in public law will reveal a dearth of courses dealing with court administration. This is of no great surprise to scholars of judicial administration, for serious devotion of resources to the administration of the third branch has only just begun in recent decades, and in many cases is far from adequate (see Hays and Graham, 1993; Tobin, 1999). If, as Woodrow Wilson (1908) argued, the judiciary is the linchpin of our democracy, and, as Russell Wheeler (1988) suggests, effective administration is necessary to secure judicial independence, then ensuring that both practitioners and scholars of the courts be exposed to sufficient training in judicial administration must be an important goal of graduate programs. It is with these considerations in mind that the faculty in the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina decided to develop and offer a course in judicial administration.
REASON FOR THE COURSE: SATISFYING UNMET NEEDS
Before spring 2004, judicial administration was not taught in the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina. However, both the department's MPA and PhD programs provided a constituency for such a course. The general population of MPA students on several occasions had requested that a more diverse range of electives be offered in the MPA program. Students complained that they sometimes had to go outside of the department to take courses they felt were relevant to their particular career paths. A course in judicial administration would expose them to public administration issues that exist outside of the traditional curriculum's focus on executive branch agencies and executive-legislative relationships.
A judicial administration course was of particular interest to an important subset of MPA students. In conjunction with the university's law school, the department offers a joint MPA/JD degree. This enables students to acquire both a law degree and an MPA within a four-year time period, rather than the five years it would take to complete both degrees separately. The students participating in this program constitute a unique, albeit relatively small, component of the MPA program-about 5 percent of the MPA student body. The vast majority of these students plan to enter careers working either within or with the judicial branch of government. Therefore, obtaining a knowledge of important administrative issues relevant to the third branch is vital for their educational development. Before the establishment of the judicial administration course, the only exposure to the courts they received in their studies was discussion of how court rulings and actions affected the operations of executive agencies. The ways in which the judiciary differs as an administrative entity, an understanding of which was important for their careers, was rarely examined.
Doctoral students make up the final group interested in studying court administration. The department offers a PhD in political science, and doctoral students are required to take a major field and a minor field. With a strong reputation in the area of public law, the department attracts a considerable number of students to study in that subfield. Unfortunately, as with the MPA program, no graduate course existed that enabled students to study the administration of the courts. Students thus were exposed to neither the judicial administration literature nor the major research questions confronting scholars interested in the topic. This was a distinct problem for students who selected public administration as their minor field. Before the creation of the judicial administration course, they had little opportunity to take courses that complemented their public-law course work. Instead, because the department offers no doctoral seminars in public administration, students were forced into MPA courses that often failed to offer them knowledge that could contribute to their research agendas. The court administration course solves this problem by introducing students to a different area of public law and making their other public administration courses more relevant to judicial issues-because, obviously, those courses are pertinent to judicial administration.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Reference Articles
- A Maryland state trooper gave Erik Bonstrom an $80 ticket for driving too slowly
- In California, postal worker Dean Hudson has been found guilty
- Alec Loorz, the 15-year-old founder of Kids vs. Global Warming and recent Brower Youth Award recipient, went to Congress in November for a press conference with Senators Barbara Boxer and John Kerry, who are championing legislation to stabilize US greenho
- Foreign exchange
- The buzz on bees
Most Recent Reference Publications
Most Popular Reference Articles
- Credit card debt on college campuses: causes, consequences, and solutions
- 9 questions to ask your new lover: what you were afraid to ask, but always wanted to know
- A world without nuclear weapons?
- How Tyler Perry rose from homelessness to a $5 million mansion
- Rejoice anyway - Zephaniah 3:14-20, Philippians 4:4-7 - Living by the Word - Column


