On CNET: The plasma vs. projection predicament
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
ProQuest

History of Black Mineworkers in South Africa/Mining in South Africa and the Genesis of Apartheid, 1871-1948/Apartheid, Repression and Dissent in the Mines, 1948-1982/Organize or Die, The

African Studies Review,  Apr 2007  by Moodie, T Dunbar

V. L. Allen. The History of Black Mineworkers in South Africa. London: Merlin Press, 2005. Bibliograpy. Index. Volume 1; Mining in South Africa and the Genesis of Apartheid, 1871-1948. xx + 491 pp. £40.00. Cloth. Volume 2: Apartheid, Repression and Dissent in the Mines, 1948-1982. xx + 489 pp. £40.00 Cloth. Volume 3: Organize or Die. xxxiii + 746 pp. £50.00. Cloth.

This three-volume work has a rather unconventional history. Originally commissioned by the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) as their official history, it has expanded into the current massive opus. A work of intensely committed scholarship, written for the union, it must now subject itself to academic critique. It has never been subject to peer review. That is unfortunate, because it would have benefited from scholarly criticism and editorial pruning. Vic Allen devoted more than fifteen years of his life to the writing of it. Much of that time seems to have been spent at the headquarters of the Union in Johannesburg. Thus in the third volume, where Allen chronicles the history of the NUM itself, he relies heavily on personal experience. That volume clearly sets the mark against which future accounts of the emergence of the NUM between 1982 and 1994 will have to be measured. It is an institutional history written from the perspective of the union head office. Allen is frank about tensions that arose in the course of that history, including episodes of violent conflict initiated by union members (and occasionally officials) as well as mine managers at many different levels. This is by no means a whitewash job.

The first two volumes are quite derivative. Volume 1 relies heavily on secondary literature in the history of mining. Volume 2 is a patchwork compilation of geological information, union histories, management histories, and commission reports, as well as scholarly work on migration and the South African state during the apartheid period. Throughout the second and third volumes, Allen pays particularly close attention to mine accidents, devoting entire chapters to the Coalbrook, Hlobane, and Kinross disasters as exemplars of state and management collusion in covering up unsafe practices. His analysis is a harrowing window into racially flawed stope-face relations and inept supervisory decisions in South African mines.

The very particularity of Allen's account of mine accidents points up historical weaknesses in the balance of these first volumes, however. His stress on broad structural determinations and his narrow institutional understanding of worker resistance as hypostatized in trade unions makes it problematic for him to get at "the reality of mineworkers' lives," which is his avowed intent. While recognizing that workers initially migrated to the mines for their own reasons, Allen's narrative, which hinges on structural "traps" (the poverty trap, the legal trap, and the land trap), leaves little space for worker agency until the African Mine Workers Union (AMWU) appears on the scene in the 1940s. Day-to-day struggles on the compounds and in the mines are reduced to "the monotonous uniformity" of miners' lives "over the last 90 years."

Allen and his assistant, Kate Carey, interviewed a sample of one hundred and twenty black miners, but his book makes very little use of those interviews, presumably because "the stories which they told about their lives had a monotonously similar tone about them." Allen's dependence on secondary sources and his use of a questionnaire means that the significance of the life histories of his informants was lost on him; to ask the right questions, one needs to know specificities of events. Allen notes that historical specifics were denied him because he was not able to get access to the Chamber of Mines archives; perhaps so, but he provides no evidence that he ever sought access to the state archives. He cites government report after government report, for instance, but seems unaware that the national archives contain transcripts of evidence presented to most state commissions. Moreover, the files of the "Native Affairs" department in its various incarnations, and of the Justice (including Police), Mines and Works, and Labour departments, all contain evidence of black miners' lives (even some black voices, mediated though they certainly are by official interpretation)-documentation that enables one to make sense of oral evidence, lifting mineworker interlocutors out of the "sameness which characterized their lives." I shall never forget, for example, the mounting excitement with which I heard Jackson Yaca in Lusikisiki in 1984 describe a 1938 faction fight on Crown Mines for which I had a police report from the Native Affairs archives.

Allen must have been aware of such evidence. He cites my work and that of Phil Bonner, which makes frequent allusion to it. Interestingly enough, he makes extensive use of my unpublished account of the 1946 strike (which I did not even know was in circulation) but chooses to ignore my interpretation of the origins and nature of that event, which was available as a published article. The point is not that he ignored the article but that he failed to engage with my argument, which has to do with the informal nature of most worker organization during the 1946 strike-and for ten years before the strike. Indeed, I would insist that it is impossible to understand the rise of the AMWU merely by looking at its leadership-or even its core membership. One must also examine the tenacious solidarity and indomitable integrity of generations of ordinary miners who forged their everyday lives collectively between the various "traps" which were undoubtedly slowly closing around them. If one insists, as Allen seems to, that organized worker resistance can be expressed only through a union, one ends up unable adequately to explain the 1920 strike and is left to scramble around for every little tidbit one can find to exaggerate the importance of the AMWU in 1946.