OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION NESHAP PROPOSAL
Chemical Engineering Progress, Sep 2005
REGULATORY UPDATE
On July 8,2005, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA; Washington, DC; www.epa.gov) proposed a new rale supplementing a 1998 regulation issued under the Clean Air Act Amendments to control hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from oil and natural gas production facilities. The proposal would reduce air toxics emissions from as many as 2,200 facilities (nationwide) to as few as 1,050 facilities (in urban counties only) that produce oil and natural gas. If implemented nationwide, EPA estimates that emissions of air toxics and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) would drop by 16,400 ton/yr and 31,400 ton/yr, respectively.
This supplemental plan would apply to "area sources" of HAP, or those that fall below the "major source" threshold. The latter pertains to sources that emit 10 ton/yr or more of a single HAP or 25 ton/yr or more of a combination of air toxics. The 1998 proposal specified that area-source triethylene glycol dehydration (TEG) units (which are used to remove excess water vapor from natural gas before it enters transmission pipelines) must reduce emissions in counties designated as urban areas.
The new proposition would require TEG units in any U.S. location to reduce emissions by implementing emission controls in the process vents of TEG units. These process vents will be required to do one of the following: vent emissions to a control device; make process changes to achieve emission reductions comparable to a control device; document that the unit's emissions are low enough that controls are not needed.
EPA estimates the cost to implement the rule on a national basis as $39.2 million, whereas the cost of implementation in urban counties alone would be $18.5 million. EPA will take final action on this rale by Dec. 30, 2006 (see the Federal Register, July 8, 2005, pp. 39,441-39,457).
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions


