- Breaking News San Mateo County ninth-graders struggle to stay fit
- Breaking News Food and wine events
- Breaking News Ask Amy: What To Do When the Doctor Isn t in the House
- Breaking News Ed Blonz: Keep your diet normal pre-surgery
More plutonium removed from Livermore Lab
0 Comments | Oakland Tribune, Mar 29, 2008 | by Betsy Mason
LIVERMORE -- Another shipment of weapons-grade nuclear material has made its way out of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the National Nuclear Security Administration reported Thursday.
Together with two previous shipments, this brings the total amount of plutonium and uranium down 25 percent.
The time and method of such shipments are not released.
The lab is on track to completely shed its nuclear material by 2012 as part of the NNSA's plan to consolidate the material at fewer sites to reduce the cost of protecting it.
The recent shipment went to the Savannah River Site in North Carolina, but the type of plutonium work that currently is done at Livermore Lab will be done at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico in the future.
Related Results
Most Popular Articles
- America's "other" private schools
- Pakistan's water resources: problems and remedies
- Feds order Dow to clean up chemical
- Protecting the crime scene
- New Nucleus research shows Plumtree leads IBM and SAP in portal ROI; Comparative report reveals 85% ROI among Plumtree customers from increased revenues and cost avoidance.
Most Recent Articles
"I've come to the conclusion that the country only needs one main plutonium capability," NNSA Administrator Thomas D'Agostino said last week. "You don't have communities growing up around Los Alamos."
The remaining plutonium at Livermore is adequately protected, he said, but the lab will not get the same permanent security upgrades that other sites are getting, because the material will be moved.
The 2012 goal is two years sooner than the previous plan, and D'Agostino said that is the soonest it can be done because of ongoing research at Livermore Lab and the need to move it safely.
But critics contend that it isn't safe now and could all be safely removed two or three years earlier.
"The plutonium is vulnerable today to a catastrophic release in an earthquake or terrorist attack," said Marylia Kelley of Tri- Valley CAREs at a public hearing last week on the NNSA's plan to revamp the nuclear weapons complex. "It can be taken out by 2010 safely."
The amount of nuclear material the lab currently has is classified, but four years ago it requested to double the amount of plutonium it is allowed to have to 3,300 pounds.
Betsy Mason covers science and the national laboratories. Reach her at 925-952-5026 or bmason@bayareanewsgroup.com.
- Gap CEO volunteers to cut annual salary
- Readers Forum: Gov. Schwarzenegger should sign bill encouraging oil
- Sheriff Rupf's critics off-base
- Selling liquor violates Islam, but Yemenis do it to survive
- Controlling your dog or cat's arthritis pain
- Caltrans clears Bay Area bridges after inspection
- Poli sci professor named new UC Berkeley provost
- The price of perfection: Teen overachievers failing at happiness
- Getting to the root of beautiful hair: shiny, silky hair begins with a healthy scalp - includes list of resources and a recipe for an herbal scalp tonic
- Industry Experts Launch Money Management Resources to Help People Overcome Debt and Learn Proper Money Management Practices
- Portfolio forecasting tools: what you need to know
- Made from scratch: When Honda built a plant in Alabama it also built a workforce-using local workers who had no experience in making cars - Recruitment & Hiring
- Why fly solo when an executive assistant can accelerate your CLNC® business?
- Banking technology, technological learning and competition: comparative case studies in Thai banking
- John Seely Brown Inducted Into 2004 Industry Hall of Fame
- A multi-class SVM classifier utilizing binary decision tree
Content provided in partnership with