advertisement
On The Insider: Sarah Jessica Parker's Mole Removed
Find Articles in:
all
Business
Reference
Technology
News
Sports
Health
Autos
Arts
Home & Garden
advertisement

Content provided in partnership with
ProQuest

City moves with controversial project

Oakland Tribune,  Apr 23, 2008  by Mark Abramson

A controversial development expected to bolster Foster City's population and tax revenues is moving ahead.

The City Council voted 5-0 late Monday to certify the environmental impact report for the Pilgrim-Triton redevelopment project, amend the general plan to allow the almost 21-acre project and take other action to move the development forward.

Council members voted 4-1 to rezone the site to allow housing along with the business and retail uses on the site. Councilman Rick Wykoff voted against rezoning the site, because he opposes housing there, Foster City Planning Manager Leslie Carmichael said Tuesday.

Wykoff could not be reached for comment.

Most Popular Articles in News
The Ten Best Laptop bags
Tata plans cheapest-ever car for Indian market
GLOBALIZATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF UNDERDEVELOPMENT OF THE THIRD WORLD
Corn is good for you; Corn is not only a tasty treat, but also a cereal that ...
THE 50 BEST STYLISH HANDBAGS TO CARRY
More »
advertisement

The council voted after 21 people spoke for and against the development during a public hearing, City Clerk Therese Calic said.

The project will be built on property owned by the Northwest Investment Management Co., AMB Property Corp. and Foster City Executive Park Partner near Pilgrim and Triton drives and Highway 92. It will add 730 multifamily units to the area, and redevelop 289,000 square feet of industrial, office and commercial space into 296,000 square feet of office and commercial property and a 1-acre park.

Several residents who voiced their opposition to Pilgrim-Triton contend it would snarl traffic in the area and lower property values because of its proposed tall buildings and massive size.

City officials said Pilgrim-Triton will bring more jobs and residents to the city and generate $485,000 in property and other taxes annually, compared with the $97,000 the site produces now.

"It would be primarily from property tax, but there is also sales tax and some other things," Carmichael said.

"Those buildings are fairly old, and they are an outdated use of the property," she added.

E-mail Mark Abramson at mabramson@dailynewsgroup.com.

c2008 ANG Newspapers. Cannot be used or repurposed without prior written permission.
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved.