U.S. District Court, Western District of N.Y. Case Summaries July
Daily Record (Rochester, NY), Jul 10, 2008
U.S. District Court, Western District of N.Y.
Administrative
Procedure Act
Indian Gaming
Citizens Against Casino Gambling
in Erie County v. National Indian
Gaming Commission
07-CV-0451S
Judge Skretny
Background: The plaintiffs filed this action in July 2007 challenging the National Indian Gaming Commission's decision to approve a Class III Gaming Ordinance enacted by the Seneca Nation on June 9, 2007. The NIGC's approval permits the SNI to operate a gambling casino in the City of Buffalo on land purchased by the tribe in 2005. The plaintiffs challenge the NIGC's conclusion that certain SNI-owned parcels in Buffalo are "Indian lands," as the term is defined in the IGRA. Secondly, they challenge the NIGC's determination that the Buffalo parcel was acquired "as part of the settlement of a land claim," therefore excepted from the IGRA's general prohibition on gaming on lands acquired after Oct. 17, 1988. The defendants moved to dismiss, arguing the plaintiffs lack standing to sue.
Ruling: The court finds one or more plaintiffs have standing to sue and the court has subject matter jurisdiction over the dispute. As a matter of law, the Buffalo parcel is "Indian land" within the meaning of the IGRA; however, the land was not acquired "as part of the settlement of a land claim," and this exception to the IGRA's general prohibition against gaming on land acquired after Oct. 17, 1988 does not apply to make the parcel gaming-eligible. The NIGC chairman's July 2, 2007 administrative decision approving the Seneca Nation of Indians Class III Gaming Ordinance is vacated.
Cornelius D. Murray of O'Connell & Aronowitz PC et al, for the plaintiffs, and Gina Louise Allery, Department of Justice, for the defendant
Prisoner
Civil Rights
[section]1983 Liability -- Individual Capacity
Gilliam v. Goord
05-CV-6429L
Judge Larimer
Background: The plaintiff, a former inmate, brought action alleging violations of his rights under the Constitution relating to the use of excessive force. The defendants moved for summary judgment. The plaintiff has not responded to the motion even though he called the clerk to update his address just before this motion was filed. The defendants contend the complaint should be dismissed based on the plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act.
Ruling: The court concludes the plaintiff's excessive-force claim must be dismissed for failure to comply with the PLRA's exhaustion requirement. Additionally, there is no liability under [section]1983 under a theory of respondeat superior and the plaintiff's claim is against the commissioner who personally was uninvolved in the actions on which the plaintiff's complaint is centered. The defendant's motion is granted and the suit is dismissed.
Darryl Gilliam, pro se, and J. Richard Benitez, of the New York State Attorney General's Office, for the defendants
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- "Do not rely on a single economy" ; Larsen and Toubro (L and T) was affected due to the slowdown particularly the products businesses, which include switchgears, construction equipment and industrial bars.
- "The first deliberate call we took was not to lay off anybody" ; The diversified group decided to reskill all surplus workers.
- "Government had to step up its demand" ; The downturn affected the government as much as India Inc. The outgoing advisor to the Government of India details its impact and its lessons.
- "Help your customers even in difficult times" ; Oil was at an all-time high at over $135 per barrel just before the financial meltdown. Then oil crashed to a low of $35 per barrel in January this year, bringing down any fresh demand for pipes fr
- "You have to be visible as a leader" ; Transparency is a standard operating procedure for communications during a downturn.
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- Using object-oriented analysis and design over traditional structured analysis and design
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- The best time to buy a car: December is not the only time to get a new set of wheels. We'll show you when to make your move to the dealer's showroom


