U.S. District Court, Western District of New York Case Summaries:
Daily Record (Rochester, NY), Sep 19, 2008
Sexual Harassment
Accurso v. Majestic Pools Inc.
06-CV-13
Judge Arcara
Background: The plaintiff sued her former employer and asserted she was sexually harassed by the defendant. She claims she was subjected to pervasive, unwanted attention and requests for a romantic relationship. The defendant took the plaintiff on a number of rides in his private plane and bought the plaintiff and her children gifts. The parties went to California for what the plaintiff believed was a business trip. In the summer of 2003, the defendant presented the plaintiff with a ring at work, and asked her to marry him. The plaintiff claims her complaints and requests to cease the harassing conduct were ignored and, when she finally couldn't stand it any longer, she resigned. She seeks damages under a quid pro quo sexual harassment theory, a hostile work environment theory, and for constructive discharge. The defendant moved for summary judgment.
Ruling: The court grants summary judgment in favor of the defendant as to the plaintiff's Title VII claim against him in his individual capacity and grants summary judgment in favor of both defendants as to the plaintiff's quid pro quo theory of sexual harassment. Summary judgment is denied on the hostile work environment and constructive discharge claims.
Catherine Creighton of Creighton, Pearce, Johnsen & Giroux for the plaintiff, and E. Carey Cantwell of E. Carey Cantwell PC and Lisa T. Sofferin of Brown & Kelly LLP for the defendant
Social Security
Smolinski v. Astrue
07-CV-386
Judge Skretny
Background: The plaintiff challenges the administrative denial of his claim for disability benefits premised on diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The ALJ found the plaintiff suffered from severe impairments that did not meet the criteria required for benefits and retained the residual functional capacity to perform light work with certain limitations. The plaintiff argued the ALJ was biased by a comment that the plaintiff failed to take steps to improve his situation.
Ruling: An ALJ's credibility finding does not constitute bias. The court finds that the ALJ considered the plaintiff's subjective complaints, but concluded they were not totally credible in light of the objective medical evidence in the record. The ALJ thoroughly explained his reasons for his finding, particularly that the plaintiff made little effort to improve his own conditions. The denial of benefits was supported by the evidence. The defendant's motion for judgment is granted.
Felice A. Brodsky for the plaintiff, and Jane B. Wolfe, U.S. Attorney's Office, for the defendant
Bailey v. Astrue
07-CV-0395
Judge Telesca
Background: The plaintiff was 38 years old when she filed a claim for disability benefits that later was denied. The action was filed to obtain judicial review of the denial. The ALJ found the plaintiff's impairments are severe, but do not meet any listed in the regulations. She was found to retain the residual functional capacity to perform the physical requirements of light work, occasionally lifting up to 20 pounds and standing or sitting for six hours a day, provided the work environment is free of excessive dust, fumes or humidity, which can aggravate the plaintiff's asthma. Although she is not able to partake in her past work as a home health care aid, the ALJ found there are a substantial number of jobs in the national economy that the plaintiff is capable of performing.
Ruling: The determination that the plaintiff did not experience a level of pain prohibiting her from engaging in light work was supported by the evidence. The defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted.
Thomas S. Pera for the plaintiff, and Jane B. Wolfe, U.S. Attorney's Office, for the defendant
Puglisi v. Astrue
07-CV-628
Judge Skretny
Background: The plaintiff alleges he is disabled by lupus, seizures, arthritis, urinary problems, depression, a psychological eating disorder and digestive problems. His claim for disability and SSI benefits was denied and he seeks a review of the denial. The ALJ found the plaintiff suffered from impairments that include lupus, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, a depressive disorder, alcohol abuse and cannabis abuse. The ALJ found that aspects of the plaintiff's claims were not credible, including those pertaining to his ability to support himself.
Ruling: The denial was based on significant evidence and the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted.
Dennis A. Clary for the plaintiff, and Jane B. Wolfe, U.S. Attorney's Office, for the defendant
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics


