Commentary: Beware of legislation to provide Medicare seniors with
Daily Record, The (Baltimore), Aug 22, 2003 by Special to The Daily Record
The American Association of Retired Persons has strongly opposed the House and Senate versions of legislation to provide Medicare seniors with prescription drug coverage. Thank goodness AARP has alerted its 35.5 million members, the U.S. Congress, the Bush administration and the general public to the outrageous Medicare farce now seeking congressional approval.
Consumer Reports echoes the AARP's opposition, declaring that legislation with its combination of skimpy benefits and the historically high growth of prescription drug costs mean that most consumers who lack coverage today would wind up paying more for prescription drugs in four years than they do now.
Many, including this senator, see the legislation as the first step in an attempt to dismantle the 40-year-old Medicare program. Remember, when first proposed by the Bush administration, Medicare prescription drug coverage would be provided only to those seniors who switched from Medicare to private managed care health plans. Outrage greeted this ridiculous plan. Now the legislation provides coverage for all seniors, but strongly encourages them to switch to private plans.
We have all witnessed the old bait and switch private Medicare HMOs' operation in Maryland. In the late 1990s, they lured seniors into enrolling with promises of prescription drug coverage. Within five years they closed down and left thousands of Marylanders without any coverage at all. It just wasn't very profitable to provide coverage for senior health and drug needs. I am certain that when these private plans, created with federal subsidies, see that insuring seniors' health and drug needs is not very profitable, they will raise premiums, increase deductibles and ultimately abandon their senior enrollees.
The legislation does nothing to hold down drug manufacturers' sky- high prices, which increase about 12 percent each year.
The most ludicrous part of both the House and Senate bills is the doughnut. In the Senate version, 50 percent of drug costs between $276 and $4,500 will be covered. However, there will be no coverage at all for drug costs between $4,500 and $5,800. However, when an individual's out-of-pocket spending for prescription drugs reaches $3,700, 90 percent of drugs will be covered. That hole in the coverage is the doughnut.
For the life of me, I cannot comprehend the logic that says people whose drugs cost between $276 and $4,500 need help, but those whose drugs cost between $4,500 and $5,800 need no help. That is the dumbest thing I ever heard. I guess some insurance expert told the bill's sponsors that the greatest number of seniors spend between $4,500 and $5,800 for medicine every year, and therefore to hold the $400 billion cost of coverage down they decided not to give those seniors any coverage help.
Another pitfall is the legislation's failure to protect the prescription drug coverage many retirees now receive from their employers. Valid fear exists that passage of the legislation could encourage employers to drop retiree drug coverage plans.
In its searing analysis of the legislation, which doesn't become effective until 2006, Consumer Reports states that in both the Senate ad House versions, the average Medicare beneficiary who has no prescription drug coverage and spent $2,318 in 2003 would spend more in 2007. Under the legislation, including premium, deductible, co- payments and the doughnut, the Senate version would find seniors spending $2,524 (real 2003 dollars) and $2,954 (real 2003 dollars).
Some members of Congress are calling the legislation only a beginning and better than nothing. As I see it, passage of this hoax is the beginning of the end of Medicare and less than nothing. It is a maze of complex deductibles, no assurance of lowering prescription drug prices, and huge gaps in coverage. The legislation should be discredited as holding out the false promise of prescription drug coverage for seniors and disables. Passage of the legislation will be, without a doubt, the cruelest joke ever played on an unsuspecting public by its government.
Ulysses Currie represents Prince George's County in the Maryland State Senate. He can be reached at 410-841-3127 or ulysses_currie@senate.state.md.us.
- 5 Rules for Immediate Annuities
- Death in the Family: 12 Things to Do Now
- Dumbest Things You Do With Your Money
- 6 Online Networking Mistakes to Avoid
- 401(k) Mistakes to Avoid
- 5 Economic Scenarios to Keep You Up at Night
- The Real ‘Best Places to Retire’
- Best Credit Cards for You
- 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
- The Real ‘Best Colleges’
- Home Buyer Tax Credit: How to Cash In
- Why You Shouldn't Bash Cash
- 8 Phony 'Bargains' and Better Alternatives
- Danger: 3 Debit Card Scams to Avoid
- 6 Myths About Gas Mileage
- 29 Fees We Hate Most
- Quick and Easy Ways to Boost Returns
- Best Stocks to Buy Now
- Lower Your Taxes: 10 Moves to Make Now
- New Jobs: 8 Lessons from Real-Life Career Switchers
- The New Job Market: Who Wins and Who Loses?
- Health Care Reform's Public Option: Everything You Need to Know
- Volunteer Work When Unemployed: Should You Work for Free?
- Whose Recovery Is This?
- Long-Term-Care Insurance: 4 Biggest Risks to Avoid
Content provided in partnership with
Most Recent Business Articles
- Multiple criteria evaluation and optimization of transportation systems
- Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas
- A two-leveled multi-objective symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the hub and spoke location problem
- Multi-criteria analysis for evaluating the impacts of intelligent speed adaptation
- The development of Taiwan arterial traffic-adaptive signal control system and its field test: a Taiwan experience
Most Recent Business Publications
Most Popular Business Articles
- 7 tips for effective listening: productive listening does not occur naturally. It requires hard work and practice - Back To Basics - effective listening is a crucial skill for internal auditors
- LIFO vs. FIFO: a return to the basics
- FAS 109: a primer for non-accountants - Financial Accounting Standards Board's "Statement 109: Accounting for Income Taxes"
- Too Young to Rent a Car? - 25-years-old the minimum age for car renting - Brief Article
- Design a commission plan that drives sales - Sales Commissions


