- Breaking News San Mateo County ninth-graders struggle to stay fit
- Breaking News Food and wine events
- Breaking News Ask Amy: What To Do When the Doctor Isn t in the House
- Breaking News Ed Blonz: Keep your diet normal pre-surgery
Jury awards financier $850 million more
0 Comments | Deseret News (Salt Lake City), May 19, 2005 | by Jill Barton Associated Press
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. -- Morgan Stanley must pay billionaire financier Ron Perelman more than $1.4 billion in damages, awarded by a jury saying it found clear evidence the investment firm acted fraudulently in Perelman's 1998 sale of his Coleman camping gear firm to Sunbeam Corp.
The jury deliberated for nearly four hours Wednesday before deciding on $850 million in punitive damages. On Monday, the same jury awarded Perelman compensatory damages of $604.3 million.
"This should send a clear message to Morgan Stanley about what constitutes professional and ethical behavior," Perelman's company, Coleman (Parent) Holdings, said in a statement. Perelman had sought up to $1.8 billion in punitive damages. Florida law limited jurors to that amount, or triple the amount of compensatory damages.
Most Popular Articles
Most Recent Articles
Morgan Stanley plans to appeal and pledged the verdict would not impede its business. The firm's attorneys argued they were denied a fair trial because Judge Elizabeth Maass ruled Morgan Stanley helped Sunbeam, an investment banking client, defraud investors because it failed to turn over evidence in the case.
As a result, Perelman had to prove at trial only that he relied on the fraudulent statements when deciding to sell his controlling stake in the camping equipment company.
In a statement, Morgan Stanley CEO Philip J. Purcell said the court "has done a great injustice to the employees and shareholders of Morgan Stanley."
"We will fight to have this decision overturned and we fully expect to prevail," Purcell said. "Morgan Stanley is financially strong and this latest development, while disappointing, will not impede our ability to serve our clients and grow our business."
Sunbeam filed for bankruptcy protection in 2001 after its financial troubles were discovered, and Perelman alleged he had lost millions because 14.1 million shares of Sunbeam stock he received in the deal plunged in value.
Morgan Stanley also cast itself as a victim of the Sunbeam fraud, saying it lost $300 million when the company collapsed.
Perelman claimed Morgan Stanley deceived him because it stood to earn $40 million from Sunbeam's acquisition of Coleman. His attorney, Jack Scarola, told jurors in closing arguments on Wednesday that Morgan Stanley kept hidden up to 60 million pages of potential evidence, which was the basis for Maass' ruling.
"Morgan Stanley hid evidence. Morgan Stanley destroyed evidence. Morgan Stanley filed false certifications. Morgan Stanley lied to the court and sought in every way possible to cover up its wrongdoing," Scarola said.
Morgan Stanley contends Perelman benefited from the deal because he pocketed $160 million in cash along with the stock shares, while Sunbeam absorbed $519 million in Coleman's debt.
Morgan Stanley attorney Mark Hansen urged jurors against a punitive damages award. He said the $604.3 million compensatory damages verdict was already a "severe blow" that "devastated" the firm.
Hansen said Perelman was not a vulnerable victim in the case but was a sophisticated investor with "an army of advisers."
- Getting to the root of beautiful hair: shiny, silky hair begins with a healthy scalp - includes list of resources and a recipe for an herbal scalp tonic
- Industry Experts Launch Money Management Resources to Help People Overcome Debt and Learn Proper Money Management Practices
- Made from scratch: When Honda built a plant in Alabama it also built a workforce-using local workers who had no experience in making cars - Recruitment & Hiring
- Portfolio forecasting tools: what you need to know
- A multi-class SVM classifier utilizing binary decision tree
- Why fly solo when an executive assistant can accelerate your CLNC® business?
- Banking technology, technological learning and competition: comparative case studies in Thai banking
- Building a nursing portfolio
Content provided in partnership with